Michael Prescott: "[Neil Parille's summary] has much in common with the work of Kremlinologists back in the days of the USSR....

Neil Parille details the labyrinthine politics of the latest Objectischism, so you don't have to: Two months ago I gave the lowdow...

Introduction. What is the biggest problem with Ayn Rand? A fairly convincing argument could be made that Rand’s biggest problem was her lac...

A Rand fan drives 12,328 miles t o declare her awesomeness on the face of the earth.

According to Rand, the Objectivist Ethics "holds that the rational interests of men do not clash—that there is no conflict of interests...

David Harriman has started a blog around his Objectischism-inspiring book "The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics", which is alr...

Since the McCaskey schism is (as Daniel Barnes has noted ) largely arose from "philosophical" issues, it might be illuminating to ...

It is a great shame that I have had little or no time to write about Objectivism over the past few months, as the ongoing McCaskey Objectisc...

Alternatives to Foundationalism. Whenever the Objectivist mania for “validating” such things as “reality,” “causality,” “man’s mind,” “the ...

Foundationalism 101. Foundationalism, in the words of philosopher Rob Bass, is “one of a number of views that holds that knowledge has foun...

Primacy of existence versus primacy of consciousness. Rand’s explicates her views on this issue as follows : The primacy of existence (of r...

Seddon’s defense of Rand’s free will. In Fred Seddon’s review of my book Ayn Rand Contra Human Nature , we find the following curious asser...