Monday, April 08, 2024
Objectivist Round-up, April 2024
Monday, March 04, 2024
Objectivist Roundup, March 2024
Sunday, February 04, 2024
Objectivist Roundup, February 2024
i. Rand was always intense, even when reheating the Borscht her cook made.ii. Binswanger concedes that Rand occasionally got unnecessarily angry at interlocutors because she would judge their motives and premises prematurely.iii. Rand didn't see all the implications of some of her ideas until the 1970s. That was a new one to me.iv. Rand was a great psychologist, including better than many "respected historical psychologists." James Valliant made a similar claim recently.v. Binswanger still hates the Brandens ("villains"). Fair enough from his perspective, but he actually claims Rand's excommunication letter in 1968 (To Whom It May Concern) was measured and even Olympian. It's hard to imagine calling Nathaniel a thief without evidence as being measured. As Nathaniel said in his memoirs, Rand's attack was so "over the top" that people wondered if he was an alcoholic or a child molester.vi. Maybe not a major point, but Binswanger misrepresents Barbara's Branden's biography (The Passion of Ayn Rand) on Rand's final meeting and phone call with Rand. As Binswanger says, Rand and Barbara met in Rand's New York apartment in 1981. According to Barbara, after the meeting, she sent Rand a letter stating that she was writing Rand's biography. When Rand didn't respond, Barbara called her. Rand refused to talk. Barbara says she was certain that this was due to Rand's disapproval of the prospective biography. Binswanger doesn't mention the letter and says Barbara first mentioned the idea of the biography in the phone call and asked for Rand's assistance. He says Barbara claims that this final conversation was of a "I'm sorry that things didn't work out" variety. This was manifestly not what Branden wrote. (The existence of the post-meeting letter mentioning a biography is confirmed by Cynthia Peikoff in 100 Voices). Perhaps Binswanger should have re-read the relevant page in Branden's biography before accusing her of lying.
Monday, January 01, 2024
Objectivist Roundup, January 2024
1. William O’Neill’s 1971 book With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of the Philosophy of Ayn Rand was recently re-published. It was probably the first critique of Rand’s philosophy published. It’s been years since I read it, but my recollection was that it was hit-or-miss.
[O'Neill's book was the first philosophical critique from an academically trained savant. Albert Ellis had a few years earlier written a book length critique of Objectivism (i.e., Is Objectivism a Religion?) focusing on psychology, politics and economics.]
2. Carl Barney, the multi-millionaire ex-donor to the Ayn Rand Institute, and head of the Prometheus Foundation, recently posted a curious blog entry, Who Represents Objectivism. He writes:
“There have been many alleged spokespersons for Objectivism—Mike Berliner, Harry Binswanger, John Ridpath, Peter Schwartz, Yaron Brook—and we’re now told of a “Chief Philosophy Officer,” Onkar Ghate. There’s something we should not forget.”
I’m wondering if there is a back story here. With the occasional exception of Binswanger, I’m not sure if any of these have ever claimed to be a spokesperson for Objectivism. Barney then goes on to sing the praises of Leonard Peikoff, who claims to quite literally speak in the name of Ayn Rand.
This is something I didn’t know:
“Much of Leonard’s clarity and conviction undoubtedly was influenced by his 30-year close relationship with Ms. Rand—thousands of hours of discussion (from which he took careful notes), and the Q&As, and the collaboration undoubtedly enabled him to speak with such clarity and conviction.”
Can the publication of Leonard Peikoff’s Journals and Marginalia be far off?
3. Long-time Objectivist author Andy Bernstein has a new Kindle book on racism called American Racism: Its Decline, Its Baleful Influence, and Our Looming Race War.
4. Speaking of Bernstein, Yaron Brook wasn’t pleased to be asked why he isn’t teaching at Ayn Rand University. Brook claimed not to know. I certainly don’t know but considering that he writes for Craig Biddle’s The Objective Standard I doubt he will be teaching at ARU any time soon.
5. Speaking of Brook, he is scheduled to appear on January 12, 2024 in Centennial, Colorado. For a mere $400 you can sit next to him at the post-speech dinner.